Mediumship and Life after Death

December 10, 2009

Misinformed opinions

It is sad to see that there are people who give misinformed opinions and who have also “years of experience” Reading an article in Psychic news I felt I had to reply it was not printed though:

I write to distinguish a fundamental mistake in the view given by Mr T Darcy of High Wycombe in the issue number 4033, Saturday 28th November.

He states that “”we know in most cases clairaudient mediums say they can “hear” words, music sounds in one ear rather than both ears. They are not hearing sounds outside the head, otherwise this would be direct voice”

This is entirely incorrect. Direct voice is an altogether different form of mediumship and is akin to physical mediumship in that the mechanism is produced by Spirit manipulating ectoplasm or other forms of material so that spirit can make contact through the form produced usually a “voice box” and produce the affect of sound “directly, in air” for all to hear whether they are a medium or not. That is not what he is describing at all.

I was very fortunate to have sat with Mr Leslie Flint on one occasion and I can confirm it is a completely different experience to what Mr Darcy is claiming.

I myself happen to be a teacher and Clairaudience like the other gifts are, on what you may call a sliding scale, with everybody experiencing slightly different things according to their own knowledge, understanding and spiritual standing too.

As I think Silver Birch once said, “We can only assimilate knowledge when we have reached the understanding to use it.”

Talking strictly about Clairaudience I would say this. It would range from very faint sounds and words almost imperceptible, through to more definite sounds and words and further to sounds heard from the front of the head to various parts of the head. Exactly how you hear these depends on many things. That will range from up to very clearly and distinctly hearing conversations with sounds heard directly from outside your head almost as in normal hearing. This last effect is “true clairaudience” and it is proper “clear hearing” which is what the term refers to.

Leo Bonomo

November 28, 2009

Landmark Ruling means Spiritualist can claim religious discrimination.

Landmark Ruling means Spiritualist can claim religious discrimination.

The Judge wrote “I am satisfied the claimants beliefs that there is a life after death, and that the dead can be contacted through mediums are worthy of respect in a democratic society.”

November 20, 2009

Words of comfort for those who mourn.

How comforting it must be to see and understand that there is something else after this life.

Through eons man has realised even from prehistoric times, that there must be “something else” it can be seen in the drawings in caves of rituals and of the wonderment in the simplest of things like the moon.

As time progress’s we can understand more and more of this “thing” and the proof of it is incontrovertible not only through proper, wonderful mediums but also through the science of quantum physics.

All of us have this innate ability which we can bring to the fore should we wish. All of us have had instances where for example an old friend whom we lost contact with rings “out of the blue” but yet with that ring we know who it is…

As we are exposed more and more to such programs, films and books as positively portrays that side of life people have become used to discussing it and being more open with it. That is certainly a good thing because it shows that these experiences aren’t “just a one off” it’s not a case of “they (a weirdo) believe such and such” it a very good case of “many people seem to understand and have experience of” and that is such a different perspective.

Just being able to discuss this subject and fully understand that so many people have had these experiences surely begs the question; it seems so possible that it is real, that there must be something after this. We need, according to our own beliefs, to search out “our truth” whether it is through a religion or direct experience or indirect through others we know, and have to sum it up for ourselves.

So many of us are now willing to express, to voice the occurrences that all added together it brings weight to the facts. Let me assure you, they are facts, proven beyond doubt in many varying ways. Go to my site www.leo-bonomo.com and look at some of the evidence yourselves. Proof of reincarnation, pictures of ghosts – for want of a better word, links to sites that have irrefutable facts and pages like some found on this blog, as to why there is no need to fear death, the act of death or that particular passing phase. It is natural after all.

As I have said before, you have not had a fear of being born have you? Most have no or very little recollection of it and so the same can be said of the return journey. If we were to use a Skeptic argument that is “no one remembers or has knowledge of passing” then the same can be applied to being born. Skeptics may well then argue that yes but I am here! You can just hear those in Spirit laughing loudly “yes and so are we” once you have reasoned with your mind and I always urge those to be critical, you are then left with mounds of proof that you cannot dismiss.

Great learned minds, often Skeptical have then understood and have championed the cause of a life hereafter.

November 14, 2009

Spiritualists legally recognised status

Hi All

We thought you would all be interested in the following news that has been reported in various national papers today. Greater Manchester Police have been taken to an employment tribunal by one of their police trainers over claims they sacked him because of his Spiritualist beliefs.

Alan Power, who has been a member of a Spiritualist church for 30 years, claimed that psychics could help detectives solve crimes. An employment tribunal yesterday ruled that Spiritualism should be placed on a par with other mainstream religions and philosophical beliefs and therefore Spiritualists should not be discriminated against. Despite the attempts of the police lawyer to equate Spiritualists with Jedi Knights and claims that just because there are thousands of Spiritualists and hundreds of Spiritualists churches doesn’t mean it is a religion, the judge accepted that ‘….in common with other Spiritualists, the claimant (Mr Power) believes in the existence of a god and that the dead can be contacted through mediums. I am satisfied that such beliefs are capable of being religious beliefs for the purpose of the 2003 regulations.’ (Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003). This is a landmark ruling for Spiritualists and goes some way to giving us back the legally recognised status that this government removed with the Repeal of the Fraudulent Mediums Act back in 2008. There’s still some way to go to ensure Spiritualists are not discriminated against in other areas but this is a brilliant start. Have a good weekend and try and keep dry! xCarole Policy Administrator SWA

November 6, 2009

Historically, closed-minded skeptics have opposed every invention and discovery and have made fools of themselves

Proud to reproduce this! More info www.leo-bonomo.com

Historically, closed-minded skeptics have opposed every invention and discovery and have made fools of themselves:

• Sir William Preece former chief engineer of Britain’s Post Office will be remembered for making one of the most ‘idiotic’ comments in history about Edison’s inventions. Sir William stated that Edison’s lamp (parallel circuit) was a ‘completely idiotic idea’!

• Professors, including Professor Henry Morton who knew Edison, stated, immediately before Edison demonstrated the electric light globe: ‘On behalf of science … Edison’s experiments are a … fraud upon the public.’

• The Scientific American, The New York Times, The New York Herald, the U.S. Army, academics — including Professor of Mathematics and Astronomy Simon Newcomb from John Hopkins University— and many other American scientists all heaped derision, ridicule and denigration onto the Wright brothers claiming that it was: ’scientifically impossible for machines to fly’!

• One of the leading scientists from the French Academy of Sciences stated that hypnosis is a fraud and stated after seeing a hypnotized subject with a four inch needle in the top of his arm: ‘This subject has been paid for not showing he’s in pain’.

• Another scientist from the French Academy of Sciences, after listening to a record made by Edison, stated: ‘… clearly that is a case of ventriloquism’!

• John Logie Baird, the inventor of television, was attacked by closed-minded skeptics who stated it was: ‘absolute rubbish that television waves could produce a picture!

There are hundreds of other examples of how closed-minded skeptics refused to believe anything which was not consistent with their own entrenched cherished beliefs and their five senses.

The above examples were taken from a most powerful book by Richard Milton called FORBIDDEN SCIENCE – SUPPRESSED RESEARCH THAT COULD CHANGE OUR LIVES

October 30, 2009

A VERY SPECIAL LEGAL MESSAGE

I am very pleased to once again be able to copy something from Victor Zammit, The lawyer who presents the case for the afterlife. Victors web address is at the bottom of this articule         www.leo-bonomo.com

A VERY SPECIAL LEGAL MESSAGE FROM VICTOR: THE ‘AFTERLIFE EVIDENCE’ UNDER EVIDENTIARY SCRUTINY:

(1) SCIENCE DOES NOT SUPPORT THOSE WHO ARGUE AGAINST THE AFTERLIFE: – I know this may shock a few people: – you will NOT find a book in any library in the world written by a scientist or a skeptic or a materialist or anybody else which shows that there is no afterlife or that there cannot be an afterlife. That being the case, those against the afterlife have a ‘belief’ – this means that a belief is subjective and is subject to fundamental errors to complete invalidation.

(2) SCIENCE SUPPORTS THOSE WHO ACCEPT THERE IS AN AFTERLIFE: There have been so many scientists who, AFTER THEY USED SCIENTIFIC METHOD TO INVESTIGATE THE AFTERLIFE EVIDENCE – conceded that there is an afterlife – the evidence is ‘overwhelmingly convincing.’. (access chapter 2 and chapter 25 of my book for some of these scientists). These are scientists who can perceive the paranormal and the afterlife with true empirical equanimity – with true ’scientific balance.’

(3) THE AFTERLIFE EVIDENCE IS NOW SCIENTIFIC: it is now objective and repeatable – which makes it scientific. Afterlife evidence has nothing to do with beliefs, religion, blind faith or subjectivity.

(4) NO GENIUS SCIENTIST, NO GENIUS CLOSED MINDED SKEPTIC or anybody else has been able to refute the evidence for the afterlife. In ten long years, NO genius skeptic, no materialist or anybody else was able to show where, when, how and why the afterlife evidence is not valid – not even for the allurement of ONE MILLION DOLLARS!

(4b) Just one example. I am on record for stating that the empirical investigations on David Thompson materialization medium every week for fifteen months showed there is objectivity and repeatability. For a period of twelve months I offered the skeptics the sum of $500,000 to show why the experiments we were conducting were not scientific – or to show that fraud was taking place or for the skeptics to duplicate what we were doing with David Thompson. In 12 months no skeptic, no scientist, no materialist from anywhere around the world had the courage, the fortitude or the motivation to take us on. Apparently, they had legal advice – which told them to keep away from those who can demonstrate objectivity and repeatability. (one condition was that if the applicant failed to show fraud etc. the applicant had to pay us the $500,000).

http://www.victorzammit.com/week3/

October 22, 2009

Mediums – looking on the negative.

Mediums – looking on the negative. more on this subject: www.leo-bonomo.com

 I am, as most would acknowledge, an optimistic person by nature however I feel that there are times when we should look at the negatives in a situation.

 I say this because quite rightly many inspirational things come from Spirit but I feel to help further the cause against those who commit crimes in this particular plane, some of the negatives really do need to be highlighted.

 There is very definitely an air in the world, coming quite sadly from those nations who have great influence, that you grab what you need, sod everyone else and its me, me, me, pushing everybody out of the way because “celebrity” at any cost is what matters, I cannot abide some shows that bring intentional divisive and abusive fractions together for public display, and that for example “I have a certain gift so YOU NEED TO RESPECT ME” rather than everyone having respect for each other. It is beyond me that there are very many who delight in seeing this bickering.

 Respect is a strange word isn’t it? It’s value has changed considerably. It used to mean that someone earned it by deeds and actions, most usually good ones. It meant someone who deserved respect because they were good people for the righteous reasons of a good person. You can never demand respect for then it is given grudgingly and in fear, that is not respect. That is fear. Respect has to be earned. That simple fact escapes many. Respect can only be given, never taken.

 It is taken by today’s standards to mean “I will break your face if you don’t” and people now demand it rather than give it. It comes I feel from a frustration of following the pack rather than your own instincts. People feel rightly or wrongly that if they seem to be “Street wise” and “at it” then that is where respect comes from. Hence we get trends of for example carrying knives, and killings and maimings of various sorts.

 This brings me to the discussion proper. I feel very strongly that the negatives be well advertised and understood. If you commit crime you should be made aware that whatever the “plea bargain”, whatever your solicitor has done to get you off, whatever lies you have successfully told, YOU ARE NOT GOING TO GET AWAY WITH IT.

 Once you return home, to Spirit, you will have to face all you have done good or bad. No more smirking at the camera, no more smiling at your victims family, no more “that’s that sorted” and on to the same way of living. YOU WILL HAVE TO PAY.

 Of course we can apply that to the majority of the people in everyday lives not in the extreme sense given above but in “getting one over on your neighbour” style. They need to understand that it does not have to be that way. Don’t follow the others just to be “respected.”

 Respect also comes from being strong, and that’s not in the physical sense, but from the point of view of “I know everyone else does it BUT, it is not for me” point of view. A person who relishes the idea of being different, of setting their own style, by some much store is set by it.

 SO, it is so strange that once you have set your style for example the hoodie thing, once they all follow you are reduced to being once again one OF a million, not one in a million. On this particular point I want to draw attention to a particular dress style, the one of the trousers hanging down past the buttocks.

 It is taken as sign of being a gang member, of being a prison prospect of someone you have to watch what you say with, of the possibility of violence etc.

 Few who follow this style of “hard men” understand where it came from. It came from the prisons of the USA, and far from it being the tag of a hard man it is very much the tag of being submissive in the most demeaning way of all.

 It comes from the submission of giving your body to those who dominate by sexual means. It shows to those who “really are in charge” that you are no threat whatsoever and in fact if you want access to me sexually, then I am showing you that my trousers are half way down already. It is the very lowest act of demeaning submission to another. You’re available, you are theirs. Infact you are anybodies who wants to subdue you. Not the sign of a hard man at all.

 I feel that this shows how following the pack from this example to carrying knives to “everyday crimes” of fiddling taxes or whatever and abuses of others is to some great degree misunderstood by those who perpetuate it.

 We need to break this circle to truly let people be free to be who they are. We can change the world in this aspect.

 Of course we are not going to stop those who feel that, that way of acting is for them. They have their own paths and lessons to learn and we cannot judge them however for those who fall into the group of I am doing it because it’s “what we do” because “everyone else does it”, we can and should change minds. We need to give them the choice. They need to be aware of the true and very real state of things. Protected from themselves.

 This does not stop of course as already mentioned, with the “ordinary people” it counts so greatly against those in power. One of my favourite programs is yes minister. Politicians have said it is so true to life it is frightening. You can see the logic it perpetuates in the news daily, seemingly incomprehensible decisions backed up by argument.

 Those who make decisions that affect us all have such a great price to pay for selling us out. It is one thing to mug someone and the fallout from that, but to make a decision for example, change the law to distract funds from pensioners to prop up the state, that is very much another matter.

 The ripples are countless. Farther reaching are those who wage war for whatever reasons. Those who believe in life after death will probably have no doubt that “Hitler will pay for his sins” why do we not understand that for example, going to war in Iran, is going to have the same repercussions for all those who voted for it?

 We seem to imply that “others will get their comeuppance” but not us?

 We all have personal responsibility; we seem to forget it when it is convenient. Those that do not know or understand this basic principal, ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO MAKE LIFE CHANGING DECISIONS FOR OTHERS, OR MAKE DECISIONS THAT AFFECT OTHERS like DRINK DRIVING need to be informed. For others who work in companies that defraud its customers.

This is one way we can truly make a significant change for the better. Tell others that they will have to pay for their actions, there is no “get out clause” and you have eternity to pay for it.

 Much light to you all and prayers for and to the world.

 Leo X

October 21, 2009

THE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF SURVIVAL AFTER DEATH

Taken from: http://www.elfindiaries.co.uk/roll.htm  DO read this it will give validation to your belifes and knowledge. It confirms what we have known since man began – there is so much more. Love and Light, Leo.

THE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF SURVIVAL AFTER DEATH by Michael Roll Head of the Campaign for Philosophical Freedom

Michael Roll believes in everyone’s right to know the truth as it is discovered, without suppression any of the facts, however disruptive or uncomfortable it may be for those who have the control over our education. Ever since the dawn of history there have been stories of people being seen again after their physical bodies had been buried or cremated.

Our ancestors who had no knowledge of subatomic physics – that reality also exists beyond our five physical senses – understandably thought that they were witnessing something that was supernatural, outside the laws of nature. Thankfully, scientists now know that nothing is outside of nature’s laws. If something happens, there must be a rational explanation to account for it. The trick is though, to find the explanation; this is the task of scientists and philosophers.

The subject of life after death is subatomic physics – natural philosophy – not supernatural religion and parapsychology. We have had the experimental proof that we all survive death ever since Sir William Crookes submitted his reports to the Quarterly Journal of Science in 1874.

International teams of scientists then repeated Sir William’s experiments and obtained the same results. These were repeatable experiments under laboratory conditions where people who once lived on earth came back and proved to these scientists that they were still alive. In effect, that we possess two bodies, one that we see containing the brain that dies, and one that is invisible containing the mind that survives. Nothing happened yesterday in the laws of physics that does not happen today.

Three thousand seven hundred years ago the Egyptians witnessed the same thing as our contemporary scientists, and understandably jumped to the wrong conclusions when their leader Osiris appeared after he had died – his followers made him into God! There are 17 saviour-gods known to historians ranging from Osiris right through to Jesus Christ. We now know what a terrible mistake it was to make people appearing from ‘the next world’ into supermen or superwomen.

All scientists who have taken part in experiments where they have physically met people from the next world, agree that these etheric people are exactly the same as the people on earth and definitely not angels, devils, gods or the big G himself. My father died in 1967, but he came up and embraced me at an experiment in 1983.

At the beginning of this century our British pioneers of radio, Sir William Crookes, Sir Oliver Lodge and John Logie Baird were adamant that the mind and brain are separate, and that we all survive the death of our physical bodies. They said that so-called paranormal phenomena is a branch of subatomic physics – natural phenomena. At this time scientists all over the world were following Sir Isaac Newton’s Theory of the Ether.

 This gave an astronomical location for a parallel universe or a “next world” that we can move onto after our physical bodies pack in. A scientific tragedy took place when Sir Isaac Newton’s Theory of the Ether was replaced by Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Relativity is a materialistic view of the universe with no room for a rational explanation for survival after death.

Ever since the death of Sir Oliver Lodge in 1940, the vast life after death industry has been hijacked by religionists and materialists who will be ruined if millions find out that the study of life after death should be in the hands of philosophers, physicists, chemists, engineers and mathematicians, not priests and parapsychologists who have started all their research from the false base that the mind and the brain are the same thing. Every scientific paper that is submitted supporting the pioneers of radio and television and showing that the mind and brain are separate is censored.

It is not politically correct to say that we survive death.

The main reason why Sir William Crookes’ revolutionary, scientific experiments failed to have the impact they should have done is because they lacked the backup of a detailed mathematical theory. In 1996 we now have this missing mathematical theory but it is being suppressed solely to keep outdated scientific theories from being destroyed. The Bath-based scientist Ronald Pearson has discovered Sir Isaac Newton’s Ether.

Mr. Pearson has returned in triumph from the Sir Isaac Newton conference that had to be held in Russia because Sir Isaac is persona non grata in his own country. The Russians have published Ronald Pearson’s discoveries but they have not even been reported in Great Britain. We have the scientific proof of survival after death. “The discovery of what is true and the practice of what is good are the two most important objects in life” – Voltaire.

I would like to make it clear that the subatomic explanation for so-called psychic phenomena is nothing to do with me. It was first hinted at by the brilliant Greek physicists over 2000 years ago and later taken up by Sir William Crookes, Sir Oliver Lodge, Arthur Findlay and a host of others at the beginning of this century. I am only the messenger of their suppressed work. These pioneers of nuclear physics have now been completely vindicated by recent revolutionary discoveries. We now have giant ‘microscopes’- subatomic particle accelerators – costing billions of dollars, we now know that we are made of the same stuff that our television signals are made of – invisible light waves. Hardly anybody understands even basic nuclear physics. It is not too difficult really. The whole of our physical universe, from the sun to our bodies, to the air we breathe, consists of just 3 basic subatomic particles, they make up everything. The proton, neutron and electron. These are the building blocks of our physical universe. All the modern nuclear physicists have done is to discover the building blocks of Pythagoras’s unseen and normally unsensed universe, and the exciting thing is that it is teeming with life. We have our physical body that is made of protons, neutrons and electrons, but we also possess an invisible etheric body that consists of much finer and faster vibrating subatomic particles that are still within the same atom as our physical particles. At the death of our physical body our mind carries on exactly as before, but within the etheric body in the very substantial universe that is beyond the range of our normal physical senses.

The so-called supernatural and paranormal is natural and normal after all. “Now your world has seen the havoc wrought and the benefits that can be obtained by nuclear fission. The basis of materialism has been split altogether; the indissoluble atom has been dissolved. Scientists accept that matter is not solid, and that reality is to be found in the invisible” – Silver Birch.

When Oppenheimer discovered the atom bomb he did not do it by tinkering with a chemistry set in his back garden. He worked it out by mathematics. As soon as he wrote his equations on the blackboard his fellow nuclear physicists knew that it was a bomb. This is how our modern nuclear physicists have discovered the next world, by mathematics. We are in this world but we are not of it. We come from and will return to, the vast unseen universe that the nuclear physicists have recently discovered.

 The same universe that the physical researchers have known about for over 100 years. What Is Meant By Scientific Proof? This must consist of repeatable experiments backed up with a theory that has a mathematical base. A good example is proving that the world is round and not flat. The Greek scientist Pythagoras was the first to put forward the idea that the world was round. This was 2600 years ago. However it was 300 years later that another Greek scientist – Eratosthenes – came up with the mathematical theory for a round earth. This lacked the scientific impact it should have had because the experiment had not taken place. This came much later when Magellan sailed around the world in 1522.

The experiment together with the mathematical theory completely destroyed the medieval obscurantists – the Flat Earth religious fanatics. Proving survival after death is exactly the same, but not quite as easy, because here we are dealing with phenomena that are beyond the range of our five physical senses. In order to detect this type of phenomena we have to work with a medium – a machine that can do the job.

It was the invention of the achromatic microscope in 1830 by Joseph Jackson Lister that enabled his son to write his paper on antiseptic surgery. From this moment on we have had the proof that reality also exists in the invisible. Radio and television sets are also detecting normally invisible phenomena. They are mediums sorting out signals at different frequencies.

This is the reason why we are forced to work with a human medium in order to prove survival after death. No machine invented so far is as sophisticated as the human mind and brain. Like all great discoveries, scientific proof of life after death is very simple. Once we are shown it, the mystery and magic disappear. The atoms that make up the normally unsensed infinite universe are finer than the atoms in our more familiar finite universe. It’s as simple as that.

Even a cursory glance at nuclear physics reveals that the subject matter is outside of our normal physical senses. If we spin a bicycle wheel at 100mph, even at this low speed the spokes become invisible. They are still there but we just cannot see them. The speeds within our physical atoms are moving up to 670 million mph. It may be even faster in etheric atoms. Einstein’s E=MC2 (Energy = Mass times the square of the speed of light) The transformation of mass into energy and energy into mass (subatomic particles vibrating at staggering speeds).

This is exactly what happens when people beam down to the surface of planets in Star Trek; however fact is always much more exciting than fiction. People materialise and dematerialise in real life, in the presence of materialisation mediums; people who are now living in the vast, unseen and normally unsensed universe (the one the nuclear physicists and astronomers have recently discovered) can somehow lower their atomic vibrations and appear in our physical universe. In the not too distant future we will be able to harness the energy that is stored within the atom.

This will enable us to contemplate space travel at speeds faster than light, 670 million mph. There is no way we can explore our galaxy unless we break this barrier, because as far as space travel outside of our solar system is concerned, the speed of light is stationary. A comparatively new subatomic particle, called the neutrino, has caused this revolution. It seems to be ‘out of this world’ because it has mass but still passes effortlessly through physical matter.

Now we can begin to understand the reports of so called ‘ghosts’ walking through solid walls. Before the discovery of the neutrino there was no scientific explanation for this. Physicists do not regard the neutrino as the be-all and end-all, perhaps just an advance guard, but it is this particle that has made the nuclear physicists and astronomers agree with Pythagoras, Plato and Sir William Crookes, that there is indeed a vast universe that is beyond our physical senses.

The Etheric World Must Have An Astronomical Locality As Sir Oliver Lodge and Sir William Crookes were the pioneers of radio and television they were able to put forward a rational explanation to account for the seemingly supernatural phenomena appearing in their experiments. They said this etheric world is the same place as our radio and television signals, but at a much higher frequency.

Recent discoveries in quantum mechanics – the study of the building blocks within the atom – completely vindicate what these great physicists said at the beginning of the century. They were adamant that we all survive the death of our physical bodies. The experiments proved that we must possess two bodies. One finite body containing the brain that dies, and another infinite body containing the mind that separates when our short stay on earth is over. Lodge said the people from the next world who are appearing at the experiments must possess bodies that are made of the same invisible matter as our radio and television signals; he called it an etheric substance. With the benefit of hindsight we now know that a scientific disaster took place when Sir Isaac Newton’s model of the universe was discarded and replaced by Einstein’s Theory of Relativity.

Einstein said on his 70th birthday: “Now you think I am looking at my life’s work with calm satisfaction but there is not a single concept of which I am convinced that it will stand firm. I am not sure if I was on the right track after all.”

If only our contemporary physicists had shared Einstein’s scepticism, then we would not have wasted so much time and money trying to match up Neils Bohr’s quantum mechanics with relativity.

Even the Einstein supporter Professor Stephen Hawking (Cambridge University) admits that they are incompatible.

Apart from in Russia and a few “heretics” in the west, the whole of orthodox science is locked into a largely false, and hopelessly outdated scientific theory. We are being subjected to one extraordinary theory after another, ranging from us being able to go back in time and murder our grandparents, and then to somehow be born in another universe, to the questionable Big Bang theory that says every galaxy in the universe started from the size of a pin head at a single point in time !

This is the sort of scenario we end up with if we start our calculations from a false base. “The important thing is not to stop questioning” – Einstein. Dr. Louis Essen D.Sc, FRS, OBE, is the inventor of the atomic clock. For trying to bring common sense into physics he was told further such activity would place the tenure of his post in jeopardy. Into this scientific vacuum has stepped a retired university lecturer with a background in engineering, Ronald Pearson from Bath.

Many of the world’s greatest scientists have come from the ranks of engineers. Ronald Pearson has discovered Sir Oliver Lodge’s etheric substance, and outside of Russia, hardly anybody knows about it! He has completely discarded Einstein’s outdated Theory of Relativity and just made a couple of additions to Sir Isaac Newton’s physical laws. They now match up with quantum mechanics and provide a totally satisfactory solution for quantum gravitation.

Pearson attended the Sir Isaac Newton Conference in 1993 which was held in St. Petersburg, Russia. His scientific paper has been very well received and published. This outstanding British scientist is recognised in Russia, but has not been reported in his own country. This great scientific breakthrough actually started in 1933 when Pauli predicted that there may well be particles within the atom other than the proton, electron and the recently discovered neutron that would revolutionise scientific thinking. We have now discovered over 200 subatomic particles making up our physical universe, coming under the general heading of quarks and leptons.

In order to discover the etheric world Mr. Pearson has taken a step further, and pointed out that everything we have discovered so far within the atom is being produced from smaller primary particles at a sub quantum level. His mathematically based theory proves that when primaries of positive and negative energy collide, they breed! This yields an exciting new mechanism for creation of an expanding universe. This is very similar to what we are witnessing in nature all around us. An equation we can all immediately understand: Male + Female = New Individuals It is never a bad rule of thumb to look around at nature’s wonders when we are trying to find the answers to cosmic mysteries. When we consider that even a solid lump of granite consists of mostly empty space, and even the building blocks of the “solid” bits, protons, neutrons and electrons, cannot be seen even under the most powerful microscopes.

Therefore, it is no longer so fantastic to accept the seemingly crazy idea that the life force that drives our physical body on earth, can carry on when it packs in. Prior to his death in 1988, Professor Richard P. Feynman, a Nobel Laureate for Physics, made the following statement: “If your theories and mathematics do not match the experiment, then they are wrong.” Einstein’s theory of relativity cannot match the experiment where people who once lived on earth come back and prove they are still alive, because this theory is incompatible with even the very existence of an ether. Ronald Pearson’s Theory of the Ether most certainly does.

It shows the ether having a complex structure, intelligence and conscious, to be the core ingredient. “Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature” – Michael Faraday (British pioneer of electrical discoveries) Put quite simply, Pearson sees postmortem survival of the human psyche as one of the many functions of a multidimensional, multi-universal, subatomic grid matrix, on which all forms of life exist, and which sustains the etheric, as well as the physical consciousness, of all living organisms.

In this model, physical materialisations of so-called “dead” people, and even animals, are but a temporary merging of two different frequencies, or wavelengths, from two discrete levels of the grid, somewhat similar to when more than one radio broadcast is received on the same dial setting. Ronald Pearson gives full mathematical proofs for his theories, and these equations may one day be hailed as the long-sought key that will unlock the door to human knowledge and to the awareness of the indestructibility of life. One of the barriers to scientific acceptance of this “grid theory” (which is much more complex than this simplified explanation) has been the existence of Einstein’s theory of relativity, parts of which seem to dispute Pearson’s hypothesis. Dr. Louis Essen, however, a Fellow of the Royal Society, has informed Mr. Pearson that he has found significant errors in Einstein’s theory. This recent discovery by Dr. Essen is in accord with the statement made by Einstein on his 70th birthday. Physicists and cosmologists worldwide over the past few years have also come to the same general agreement that “Einstein’s laws contain some flaws”. They are examining discrepancies that have been found in his work, and have begun to formulate hypotheses accounting for specific occurrences in quantum physics that cannot be explained by his theories.

Some of these other theories were discussed at the conference in Russia. Ronald Pearson is confident that his “grid theory” will replace some of Einstein’s discrepant data, and will withstand close scrutiny and criticism. In his book he outlines seven experimental checks, which he is certain will give positive results and affirm his conclusions. The grid itself could be visualised as the Creator-Sustainer of a number of parallel or separate universes. This reasoning does not refute the possibility of an even higher Ultimate Intelligence behind the grid.

Many scientific careers rely on the acceptance of the Theories of Relativity so it will be difficult for Pearson to obtain endorsement of his theory from established scientific authorities, however good Pearson’s theory is. This is the form of hazard all reformers meet.

Dying is as natural as being born; we all pass into the next world whether we like it or not.

Life continues and endures in the next dimension with no divine intervention or retribution, regardless of one’s religious beliefs or lack thereof. Each human psyche seems to retain a complete record of its last physical life, and punishment for wrongdoing, if any, is meted out to oneself by oneself, after experiencing an objective review of the past life just ended. It includes events which may have been long lost to the physical memory. After this review, the entity moves to the plane which best suits the condition of his or her state of being. There are infinite numbers and graduations of these etheric planes, and with the help of guides, teachers, centres for learning, advancement to higher levels of existence is within the reach of every inhabitant on every plane.

Nothing else matters during our short stay on this backward training ground, planet Earth, but only on how we behave. We are here to develop our characters, no other reason. Nothing else matters in the slightest; nationality, what we believe, wealth, social position, what we look like, how we speak, what we do for a living.

We are all exactly the same, graded only by the progress we have made. Opposition from certain establishment scientists to this view of after death survival being a natural function of subatomic processes has also been quite strong. In spite of Lord Kelvin’s assertion that “Science is bound by the everlasting law of honour to face fearlessly every problem which can fairly be presented to it”, some scientists have refused to even look at Pearson’s data, or review the hypotheses of other researchers.

Few subjects more infuriate scientists than claims of paranormal phenomena, because, if confirmed, the whole fabric of science would be threatened. Nothing should threaten true science, which in essence is nothing more than the unceasing search for knowledge. Observed and verifiable facts call for an explanation of their cause, no matter how uncomfortable the eventual solution may be for its discoverers.

This reluctance to explore new areas of science can be equated with the torturing and burning alive in 1600 of Giordano Bruno, the scientist-philosopher who refused to recant his statement that “there exist countless suns, with countless worlds revolving around them”. The priests and so-called “scientists” of Galileo’s day refused to view the heavens through his telescope, fearing what they may observe in the night sky would overturn their antiquated cherished beliefs!

To obtain more information , books, videos, or to help Michael in his fight for Philosophical Freedom please send an A4 envelope with two first class stamps to: Michael Roll, 28, Westerleigh Road, Downend, Bristol BS16 6AH. The Campaign For Philosophical Feedom has a website: www.cfpf.org.uk “Whatever you do, trample down abuses, and love those that love you.” – Voltaire. Home Amazing Proof with a photograph Stunning Psychic Evidence

October 17, 2009

Mediums predictions from 1987 come true

In my book SUMMERLAND which you can buy through my site there are several predictions that were made.

In this book, written in 1987,  there are several predictions one of which says that “Spirit will use different technologies” below is an extract from the excellent site from Victor Zammit – see links page, and this shows it is now happening.

“Our recent travels to France and England confirm and reinforce our acceptance of the afterlife. The evidence is there for any genuine person who wants to seek the truth about the afterlife. We sat with four different ‘physical circles’ and each time the afterlife – the beings there – made it clear they wanted to tell us something about their existence. One most striking aspect of these meetings was that the mediums were not working with ectoplasm, but with a ‘new energy.’ At one stage in France, during an afternoon session, one of the windows was slightly open bringing in the afternoon light. Yet, John Sloan (Arthur Findlays’s medium when they were on physical earth) and Jonathan Sinclair – and others came through from the afterlife. That would certainly not have occurred if the medium, Tom Morris, was working with ectoplasm. We have been told that great things will be done with this new ‘physical’ energy as they are being done with ectoplasm. Several circles have been told that some time in the future there will be materializations in natural light. How soon this is going to be we do not know yet – we’ve been told that scientists in the afterlife are working on it. When that happens there will be the greatest spiritual revolution in history since these days we have advanced electronic equipment that was sadly missing in the days of the great materialization mediums of the past.”

October 15, 2009

A Touch of class? I think not!

I should like to state now (30/10/2009) that the money has finally been repaid and I send my thanks to the company for that. It is a pity though that these lenghts had to have been gone through when plain common sense  should tell you when something is just wrong. The company has proved it can be considerate.

Hi this is really off beam I know but I feel that I need to do this! For my daughters birthday we ordered a Hummer which was supposed to tour the bright lights of London town with lots of her friends…

That was the plan… It turned up an hour late… there was a half bottle of champagne left, not bad you might think but consider that my daughter is 13 and so are most of her friends! Would you want your 13 year old encouraged to drink? I think not! Anyway despite having all the extras this company seems not to have a sat nav or radio because they are totally unaware that there may be road works on the road! This is the excuse for not going to the “lights” but instead to sunny Walthamstow, obviously the pinnacle of anyone’s evening. Even more astounding that it is ten minuets away. Apparently we should be satisfied with this because they will not give our money back despite this being a breach of contract. Therefore BEWARE! A TOUCH OF CLASS IS CERTAINLY WHAT IT IS NOT. I am avoiding this like the plague and telling those that may be interested to steer well clear. No pun intended!

This has been highlighted on Twitter too!

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.